Grasso and Ingroia Graviano
From the website www.19luglio1992.it
Here are some statements to the press by the national anti-mafia prosecutor Piero Grasso and the Palermo prosecutor Antonio Ingroia on the story Severity:
Piero Grasso says that what has denied a new period of isolation during the day to Joseph Gravity "is a decision of the enforcement court, on which I feel out of place to practice in conspiracy." The two theses (the reward of his first award as opposed to silence or tell the truth) are "two reconstructions without foundation, because the decision was not taken by the political-administrative which can move up a level of discretion for a specified target, or by a prosecutor who would seek to other research results. The judges of the Assize Court of Appeal had no other purpose but to apply the law in that particular situation, with no margin of discretion. After these arguments based on nothing, no matter what this person had to say one day there will be those who will question its reliability, rescued these arguments to delegitimize any statements. "
For Antonio Ingroia" any attenuation of 41 a would be negative and could give retropensieri to rise, but this is not the case. There was no government intervention, as there has been a favorable opinion of some prosecutors investigating, so I would exclude hidden purpose in a measure which appears purely technical grounds. In events like these it is good to keep the pressure, but you also need that information is as correct as possible. The important thing is that it has not been touched for 41 bis. One can imagine that in some cases the roof of 3 years like the present day isolation is not sufficient, and that judges be given the opportunity to extend it when certain requirements are met, but it would be a political choice that is up to Parliament, not the magistrates. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment